Recently we compared the Ryzen seven 5800X and Core i7-11700K in 32 games running at 1080p, 1440p and 4K using the Radeon RX 6900 XT. Past the determination of that shootout nosotros commented that nosotros may want to re-run all the benchmarks to include the more affordable Core i7-10700K which is like, still widely available, and tin net yous most $100 in savings, so here we are.

The idea of the original comparison review was to see how latest and greatest AMD and Intel viii-cadre/sixteen-thread processors do against each other and where each company stands in terms of gaming performance. That's not to say we're recommending yous race out and buy either of those CPUs right at present. In fact, in our recent update to the Tiptop 5 Best CPUs we chose the Core i7-10700 series as the best value pick for gamers on a budget.

Every bit of writing, the Ryzen vii 5800X will fix you dorsum $430 and the Core i7-11700K $400. Nevertheless, the older Core i7-10700K is ~20% cheaper at $330, and there's also the locked version, the 10700F at just $270 -- almost importantly, out of the box performance is nearly identical. For most builders, I'd recommend the F-SKU, only for the sake of this comparison the 10700K makes more than sense given it's going upwards confronting the 11700K and 5800X.

We'll discuss value and pricing in better detail towards the cease of this review, after we've seen how each CPU performs against the others. For testing we've used One thousand.Skill'southward 32GB TridentZ Neo DDR4-3800 CL14 memory and for the Radeon 6900 XT.

For the AM4 platform we've the tested using the MSI X570 Unify and for the LGA1200 platform the Gigabyte Z590 Aorus Chief running the latest BIOS on both counts, and of course, the latest brandish drivers and Windows 10 version bachelor.

In total we've tested 32 games at 1080p, 1440p and 4K, and we'll look at the data for about a dozen titles and so get into the usual data breakdown. So permit's do it…

Benchmarks

Starting with the Horizon Zero Dawn, nosotros see that at 1080p the 10700K is slightly slower than the 11700K. We're talking about a 4% drib in operation, though that was plenty to encounter the Ryzen vii 5800X pull ahead by a 7% margin.

Certainly not a large difference and as expected they are reduced further when increasing the resolution. The 11700K is only 3% faster at 1440p, while the 5800X was half-dozen% faster.

Then for those playing at 4K it really doesn't matter which of these CPUs you use, the experience is going to be identical.

Moving on to Watch Dogs: Legion we find a like situation where the 10700K is slightly slower than the 11700K, and therefore also trails the 5800X. The margins are minor though, the 5800X was seven% faster at 1080p for instance and 6% faster at 1440p, though interestingly maintained a 5% margin at 4K, though we're talking about but a three% deviation there.

Metro Exodus Enhanced plays just too using any of these CPUs, and so here we're in no manner CPU express with these viii-core/16-thread processors. Using whatever of these architectures you'd likely accept to drop down to 4c/8t to see a decrease in performance, though at this point there are no quad-core Cypress Cove or Zen iii processors.

Next upwardly we have Microsoft Flight Simulator 2022 and previously nosotros found the Ryzen vii 5800X and Core i7-11700K to be very evenly matched using the Radeon RX 6900 XT in the department of the game we test, which is the landing challenge at Sydney aerodrome in Commonwealth of australia.

Testing with the 10700K reveals very like performance under these examination conditions. In fact, the 10th-gen CPU was four% faster at 1080p when compared to the newer AMD and Intel models, and two% faster at 1440p. We're talking about slim margins, so overall the experience should be much the same using any of these processors.

Testing at 1080p in Cyberpunk 2077 previously revealed the 11700K to exist a smidgen faster than the 5800X, and with the 10700K we've found it to be slightly faster again. We're talking nigh a slim 4% advantage in favor of the 10th-gen function at 1080p. That margin is cleared one time yous play at 1440p.

Again we find that it doesn't thing which one of these eight-cadre processors you use for gaming, performance is going to be much the same, though of course the reason nosotros're retesting is because the 10700K/10700F can be had for less.

The Star Wars Jedi: Fallen Guild results are interesting and a bit odd because the 10700K is up to vii% faster than the 11700K and 5800X at 1440p. Fifty-fifty more odd, while the boilerplate frame rate is 7% greater, the 1% low drops by 7%, potentially resulting in less consistent performance, though we should annotation, no noticeable differences were seen.

In CoD Warzone, the 11th-gen 8-cadre processor is slightly faster than the tenth-gen model, delivering iii% greater frames at 1080p and 1440p. The 5800X was upwardly to six% faster than the 10700K.

The 11700K and 10700K deliver most identical performance in Expiry Stranding and that means the 5800X is ~8% faster at 1080p and vii% faster at 1440p. That's a reasonable advantage for the Ryzen 7 processor, though frame rates were already excessively high, fifty-fifty at 1440p.

Resident Evil Village results are a lot like what we just saw in Death Stranding, and that's to say the 5800X delivers a performance advantage at 1080p where information technology was up to 12% faster. That margin was reduced to nearly zilch at 1440p, though the 1% low performance was still a tad better.

Before we had found that Ryzen performs peculiarly well in Rainbow Six Siege and in this case even the older 10th-gen series beats its newer generation. The 10700K is fourteen% faster than the 11700K at 1080p and that meant the older tenth-gen function was just 3% slower than the 5800X. Then we come across that margin entirely eliminated at 1440p and 4K.

We test War Thunder using the Tank Battle CPU benchmark and for some reason the Intel CPUs create a strong bottleneck in this test, resulting in almost the same performance seen across all three tested resolutions. This meant the 5800X was up to 25% faster than the 10700K, not a margin yous'd normally await to see.

The Intel CPUs also lagged behind in World State of war Z, at least relative to the 5800X, which was up to 27% faster than the 10700K. The margin was reduced at 1440p and then neutralized at 4K, but notwithstanding when CPU limited AMD is much faster for this title.

Performance Summary

Now here's a look at all the 32 games we tested, starting with the 1080p data...

But earlier nosotros dig into the new data, hither'due south a quick recap for the Ryzen 7 5800X vs. Core i7-11700K comparison: previously we saw that at worst the 5800X was 2% slower than the 11700K, which is a negligible departure given we deem margins of 5% or less to be a describe.

That means for 75% of the games tested, the margins were meaningless as both CPUs enabled the same gaming feel. That does leave 8 games where the AMD processor did offering significant performance gains, though y'all'd need to evaluate each championship individually equally in some instances we're talking about hundreds of fps in a unmarried player title, like World War Z, for example.

Keep in mind that those margins were seen at 1080p using a Radeon RX 6900 XT. For those gaming at 1440p the margins in most of these games shrink, with World War Z and War Thunder being the merely real exceptions. Overall, the Ryzen 7 5800X is only 3% faster on boilerplate, then for the vast majority of games you'll be looking at near identical performance.

So how does the 5800X compare to the 10700K? Well, about likewise as it did against the 11700K, significant they're about the same. The Ryzen 7 processor is just v% faster on boilerplate.

The margin at 1440p drops to just 3% in favor of the Ryzen processor. Nevertheless again the only outliers hither are Earth War Z and State of war Thunder.

There were 10 games where functioning was identical, and and so another viii games where the margin was ii% or less. For more than half the games tested nosotros found basically no performance difference at 1440p with a high-end GPU.

Now for those of you wondering how the new 11700K stacks up against the quondam 10700K, it looks similar this. At that place are a few decent wins for either chip just put them all together and the divergence is most 1% in favor of the 11700K.

In other words, they're the same for PC gaming and that's what we found in our 24-hour interval one review when comparison the 11900K and 10700K. For that 10 game sample using the RTX 3090 and dual-rank/dual-channel DDR4-3200 CL14 memory, the 11900K was simply iv% faster.

At 1440p we find that it's a tie, the 11700K was upward to six% faster simply as well upwardly to seven% slower, and so again across the 32 game sample we find that they're exactly the aforementioned. The newer 11th-gen architecture improves performance in some areas, while the increased latency hurts performance in other areas.

Which CPU is Better?

When we compared the Cadre i7-11700K and Ryzen vii 5800X before, the indicate nosotros wanted to bulldoze dwelling house was: for gaming it doesn't matter which processor y'all use, for the almost office the feel is going to be exactly the same. Simply when going beyond frames per 2nd, there was a clear winner in the 5800X. The large wins for AMD includes ameliorate power efficiency and a superior platform that'due south supported by a better range of affordable motherboards and an upgrade path to 12 and even 16-core processors.

Simply when we look across the latest generation viii-core processors, it'south difficult to ignore the Core i7-10700 series. After all, the Ryzen costs 30% more than the 10700K and roughly 60% more than the 10700F. Either Intel CPU can exist paired with a $180 MSI Z490-A Pro for maximum performance.

Similar quality AMD B550 boards tin can be had for just $120, making the Intel Z490 pick more than expensive which does sting. So the $100+ you save on the 10700K or 10700F isn't every bit meaningful when y'all have to spend extra on the motherboard.

For builders of a tight budget, we'd recommend grabbing a B560 board instead, though as we've found recently, that can be a dicey proposition in itself. That said, afterwards extensive testing we've constitute the Asus TUF Gaming B560M-Plus to be a decent motherboard that'll let y'all get the nigh out of a part like the Core i7-10700K without having to remove any power limits, it'due south full steam ahead out of the box.

That makes the 10700K/B560 combo ~10% cheaper, or more if y'all go for the 10700F. If all you care about is gaming FPS performance, then information technology's easy to justify going with Intel. Simply if you place a lot of value in future upgrades, like the power to leap up 16 cores on the same motherboard, and so it might be worth spending the extra $60 or so on the 5800X/B550 combo.

Information technology's worth noting that the Ryzen v 5600X will deliver the same level of gaming functioning in all the games available today, and then at $300 it might be a meliorate alternative to the 10700 series equally you notwithstanding get that excellent power efficiency and upgrade path.

And then, of course, when going down that path you could opt for the significantly cheaper $170 Core i5-10400. Sure, it'southward a bit slower than the 5600X, but it'southward also almost half the price and will deliver maximum operation on whatever B560 motherboard, though entry-level boards might limit your future upgrade options.

Ultimately, in that location's no ane best option for all gamers, as it will depend on your preferences and priorities, for example: how much CPU performance practise yous actually need, when and what you're likely to upgrade to in the time to come, and near importantly, what'southward your upkeep? Pricing tin can also vary from region to region, we always rely on United states pricing given it translates to most other markets well, and of grade, most of our readers are based in the U.s.a..

Simply if the 10700K and 5800X are priced closer in your region, then the Ryzen pick would be the more obvious choice, and if pricing goes in the other management then it would exist easier to justify the savings past going with Intel. Of class, don't forget to factor in the cost of the motherboard as that can make or break the bargain.

Personally, my favorite philharmonic correct at present would be the Core i7-10700F at merely $270, which out of the box will deliver virtually identical performance to the 10700K, so all the results shown here are applicable to the more affordable F variant.

Shopping Shortcuts:
  • Intel Core i7-10700F on Amazon
  • Intel Cadre i7-10700K on Amazon
  • Intel Core i7-11700K on Amazon
  • AMD Ryzen vii 5800X on Amazon
  • AMD Ryzen ix 5900X on Amazon
  • Intel Z590 motherboards on Amazon
  • AMD X570 motherboards on Amazon